Sunday, April 15, 2012

What is the Paleo diet for a person with Asian heritage?

Most of India, that is those who are not affluent, eat lentils and rice a lot. My husband just corrected me, he lived in India for 14 years, he said that most of the poor eat millet (bhakri) and vegetables. The Asians in China and Japan, eat rice and noodles as far as I know. Isn't a paleo diet relative to one's ancestors?

When we discuss Paleo eating, are we discussing our common ancestors in Africa? Anybody? I have no idea.

I have noticed with myself that carbs coming from any color veggie except white (with the exception of cauliflower), brown GABA rice, and sprouted lentils have not made any impact my weight. However, anything with sugar, no matter whether it's fruit juice or a vegan cookie, these things do have a negative impact. I also feel sluggish.

Here's an interesting article about microflora and health.
http://www.usnews.com/science/articles/2010/08/03/gut-bacteria-reflect-dietary-differences

Excerpt:

Children from Burkina Faso, who ate millet grain, sorghum wheat, legumes and vegetables, had high numbers of bacteria that digest plant fibers. Also found in the guts of termites [which these children eat], these bacteria break down fibers that humans typically can’t. The bacteria make short-chain fatty acids that give people energy and protect them from inflammatory gut diseases such as Crohn’s disease and inflammatory bowel disorder.

Burkina Faso's children also had decreased numbers of diarrhea-causing bacteria compared with children from Italy. That finding surprised the team, because the African children often drank water polluted with such bacteria.

“The notion that gut flora plays a role in human health has been marginally ignored,” says evolutionary nutritionist Loren Cordain of Colorado State University in Fort Collins, who was not involved with this study. “What we’ve found over the past five or 10 years is that it plays a huge role in our health and well being.”


This is a story, that for me, really drives home that there is no one-size-fits all diet. However, if the microbes and enzymes are in the people, and there's no genetic issue, people can adapt to any diet (sans the sugar, franken food, and factory farming, and GMO crap).

I have a couple theories that will never be proven:

My theory of how early man was able to eat foods with phytic acid and not have it block minerals: our early selves had the phytase enzyme.

My theory of how early man was able to convert ALA from nuts to DHA: healthy levels of the enzyme that does this conversion. Also, no sugar and high levels of Omega 6 to thwart the effort.

The issue is that the same enzymes that convert ALA, also convert LA into its long chain metabolite known as arachidonic acid (AA 20:4ω-6). Given this scenario it is understandable that diets high in omega6 fatty acids can influence, and in reality reduce, the conversion of short chain omega3 fatty acid into its long chain metabolites. http://www.azchia.com/ala_conversion_epa_dpa_dha.htm
You might be aware that a few studies have shown that we convert 0.5% up to 9% - 13%, women doing better than men. I doubt it's estrogen related as some scientists hypothesized. I think it's because women tend to eat healthier than men.

I would love to have the money to check the gut microbes in any healthy long term vegan. It would explain a lot, I think.

It's expensive, I bet. A comprehensive nutritional test my mother had, including her Krebs cycle, was $1400.00. It didn't check her intestinal microbes. All it did was just let us know that she needs more pancreatic enzymes among other things. The MD/ND also told us that we need to rotate our probiotics and change brands every 2 months because we get used certain strains and they are not effective.

Hypertension and sugar! Cinnamon and Curcumin for sugar control

I hope that everyone is becoming aware of the HUGE cholesterol con-job we've all been suffering from. Sugar is implicated in heart disease and it plays a big role in hypertension too.

Without having any scientific proof, I have no problem with this statement:

When a food is good for you, it’s not just good for your heart, it's good for your entire body.

When a food is bad for you, it's bad all over.


Sugar is bad on your figure, brain, heart, and every organ including the largest: your skin.



Sugar-sweetened beverages and hypertension.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21142633

Potential role of sugar (fructose) in the epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease1,2,3
Cancer cells slurp up fructose, US study finds
http://www.ajcn.org/content/86/4/899.abstract

Sugar, not just salt, linked to high blood pressure
http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/07/01/glucose.blood.pressure/index.html

Patterns: Added Sugar and High Blood Pressure
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/06/health/research/06patterns.html

There's very, very few studies on how beneficial cinnamon and curcumin are for controlling blood sugar. The lack of studies doesn't represent that they're not effective.

My belief is, based simply on profit and loss, is that the lack of many studies on ANY un-patentable natural substance is an indicator that it has the potential of being very effective.


Improved Insulin Resistance and Lipid Metabolism by Cinnamon Extract through Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2602825/

Cinnamon Improves Glucose and Lipids of People With Type 2 Diabetes
http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/26/12/3215.full

Turmeric
http://www.umm.edu/altmed/articles/turmeric-000277.htm

Effect of curcumin supplementation on blood glucose, plasma insulin, and glucose homeostasis related enzyme activities in diabetic db/db mice.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18398869

Curcumin inhibits glucose production in isolated mice hepatocytes.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18221818

Friday, April 13, 2012

Cancer cells slurp up fructose, US study finds and some interesting studies regarding cancer and pH

Here's the link on fructose causing cancer cells to go wild. What? Only one. Yes, only one. We're lucky to get one.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/08/02/cancer-fructose-idAFN0210830520100802

If you have a mother who has cancer with only a 1% chance of survival, there's nowhere else to go but way out of the box. There you can run across some pretty nutty things, but inside the box is chemo, radiation, and arrogance. Then hospice. Thankfully, I was out of the vegan box before she was diagnosed.

In the course of reading a lot of holistic health books, blogs, and forums to find something to help my mother, sugar came up a lot.

"Sugar feeds cancer" I saw it everywhere.

Now, what the hell do you eat for fun? Freeze some berries and bananas (just not 30 of them!) and blend. Add some coconut meat or an avocado and lemon juice. That's one idea. You can get very clever, just don't juice your fruit. Eat the fruit blended so you still have the fiber to slow down the impact on your blood sugar.

Here's an alternative health web site and excerpt:
http://www.nutritioncancer.com/sugarfeedscancer.html

SLOW CANCER GROWTH BY LOWERING BLOOD AND GUT GLUCOSE

(This is old, it's fructose not glucose -- see the Krebs cycle section on the Sugar: The Bitter Truth video on YouTube).

"Cancer cells demonstrate a 3 to 5 fold increase in glucose uptake compared to healthy cells."
Demetrakopoulos, GE, Cancer Research, vol.42, p.756S, Feb.1982

“Sugar is the most hazardous foodstuff in the American diet.”
Linus Pauling, PhD, twice Nobel laureate

WHAT'S AHEAD?
Cancer cells feed almost exclusively on sugar. You can slow tumor growth by:
> eating a diet that lowers blood and gut sugar
> exercise to burn up any extra glucose in the blood
> taking supplements such as chromium, CLA, and gymnema
> using medications, if necessary, for better control of diabetes

A moth is attracted to bright light, which can be its own demise if the bright light is a flame. Americans consume 140 pounds of refined sugar per year, mostly in the form of sucrose (white sugar) and corn syrup. Our incidence of obesity, diabetes, and many cancers has escalated parallel to our rise in sugar intake. We consume 15 billion gallons of soft drinks, 2.7 billion Krispy Cremes, and 500 million Twinkies per year. Our appetite for sugar is like a hummingbird sucking on sweet food all day long.

Sugar Feeds Cancer: A simple saying for something more complex.
http://www.healingdaily.com/detoxification-diet/sugar.htm

German Otto Warburg, Ph.D., the 1931 Nobel laureate in medicine, first discovered that cancer cells have a fundamentally different energy metabolism compared to healthy cells.

The gist of his Nobel thesis was this: malignant tumors frequently exhibit an increase in "anaerobic glycolysis" - a process whereby glucose is used by cancer cells as a fuel with lactic acid as an anaerobic by-product - compared to normal tissues.(1)

The large amount of lactic acid produced by this fermentation of glucose from the cancer cells is then transported to the liver. This conversion of glucose to lactate creates a lower, more acidic PH in cancerous tissues as well as overall physical fatigue from lactic acid build-up.(2,3) Therefore, larger tumors tend to exhibit a more acidic PH.(4)

Cancer and Alkaline pH studies

Bicarbonate Increases Tumor pH and Inhibits Spontaneous Metastases
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19276390

Acid pH in Tumors and Its Potential for Therapeutic Exploitation
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/49/16/4373

Tumor pH controls the in vivo efficacy of weak acid and base chemotherapeutics
http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/5/5/1275.abstract

Recent progress in tumor pH targeting nanotechnology.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18571265

Sodium Bicarbonate Appears To Slow Progression Of Chronic Kidney Disease
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/157902.php

"Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cancer are connected in a number of ways in both directions: cancer can cause CKD either directly or indirectly through the adverse effects of therapies; CKD may, conversely, be a risk factor for cancer; and both may be associated because they share common risk factors, often"

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=related:CFfJPxxsgRsJ:scholar.google.com/&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=LTZmT8vgKMuMsALXxqC3Dw&sa=X&oi=science_links&ct=sl-related&resnum=6&ved=0CKcBEM8CMAU